Paisa · Who runs it
Solutions · Mid-size

The ERP step without the ERP project.

Revenue recognition, close management, multi-entity and approval controls, in a system where the subledgers are the ledger rather than modules synced to it.

What usually goes wrong
  • A close that takes two weeks and a shared spreadsheet nobody trusts.
  • Subledgers that reconcile to the GL only after someone forces them to.
  • An implementation quote longer than the runway.
What changes
  • Days, not weeks, to close
  • Tie-outs that pass without heroics
  • Controls that survive growth
How

Three things that do the work.

One system, no syncs

Revenue, AR, AP and schedules post into the same journal the statements read. There is no integration between them to break.

A close with a status

Executable checks, flux analysis, subledger tie-outs and a period lock that actually locks.

Controls that scale

Approval ceilings, segregation of duties and an audit trail that does not need maintaining.

The modules behind it

Nothing here is a promise.

Each of these is a product page describing code that exists.

Look at the books, not the brochure.

A seeded company, a close in progress, and every number computed by the engines.